The Abuja Division of Nigeria’s Court of Appeal, yesterday, dismissed the appeal filed by a former member of the House of Representatives from Kano State, Hon. Farouk Lawan, seeking to end the $3 million bribery charge brought against him by the federal government.
Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) had arraigned Lawan on a three-count criminal charge bordering on alleged bribe to the tune of $3 million.
For many years now, Lawan has been accused to have demanded the sum of $3 million from Mr. Femi Otedola to remove his company’s name, Zenon Oil from the list of companies under investigation by the legislature on alleged subsidy fraud.
He was said to have received the sum of $500,000 from Otedola as part-payment of the alleged $3 million bribe, when he was Chairman of the House Committee on Oil and Gas.
Justice Otaluka had last year dismissed the no-case-submission filed by Lawan in his alleged $3 miillion dollars bribery trial.
The prosecution closed its case last year after calling five witnesses. Lawan, through his counsel, Mike Ozekhome SAN, then filed a no-case submission on the grounds that the evidence and testimonies did not link Lawan to the crime.
Ozekhome further submitted that if the Department of State Services (DSS) had any evidence they would have arrested Lawan immediately at the scene of the bribery which they claimed they set up.
Responding, prosecution lawyer, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), urged the court to dismiss the no-case submission and ordered the defendant to enter his defence because the prosecution had established sufficient evidence through video and oral testimonies which linked Lawan to the alleged offences.
In her ruling, Justice Otaluka agreed with the submission of Awomolo and ordered Lawan to open his defence.
He had approached the Court of Appeal to set aside the decision of Justice Angela Otaluka of a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which rejected his no-case submission in the bribery trial.
However, the appellate court in a unanimous decision held that a prima facie case was well established against him that would warrant him to enter his defence in the matter.
In the judgment delivered by Justice Olabisi Ige, the Court of Appeal held that the decision of the lower court was well founded.
According to Ige, contrary to the argument of Lawan, the prosecution’s evidence at the trial court was not in any way discredited, hence the rejection of his no-case submission.
The appellate court also held that the language of the trial judge, Justice Otaluka, which Lawan complained about did not place him in any disadvantaged position or was in any way inimical to his trial.
Justice Ige who quoted copiously from the records of proceedings of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, especially the testimonies of the five witnesses called by the federal government, upheld the findings of Justice Otaluka that there were sufficient evidence linking Lawan to the offences.
He accordingly dismissed the appeal and upheld the ruling of the trial court, which had ordered Lawan to enter his defence in the alleged bribery trial.
Gavel: Freerange