Ex-Director, Ministry of Petroleum Resources, remanded in prison custody over P&ID $9.6bn

Metro

Image result for mrs. grace taiga

As the drama in the $9.6bn, Nigerian govt and P&ID continues, the Apo Division of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Abuja, on Friday, ordered that the former Director, Legal Services of the Ministry of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Grace Taiga, charged with offences connected with the controversial P&ID $9.6bn judgment, be remanded in prison custody.

The defendant pleaded not guilty to the eight counts preferred against her by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Justice Olukayode Adeniyi ordered that the defendant be remanded in the Suleja Prison in Niger State and fixed September 25 for the hearing of her bail application.

The prosecution accused her, among other charges, of receiving bribe through her offshore bank account for signing, alongside the then Minister of Petroleum Resources, the late Rilwan Lukman, the Gas Supply Processing Agreement between the Process and Industrial Developments Limited and the Federal Government of Nigeria, through the Ministry on January 11, 2019.

She was also accused of violating various laws by entering into the GSPA without prior approval by the Federal Executive Council and a certificate of no objection to the contract from the Bureau of Public Enterprise.

The charges are in connection with the controversial Gas Supply Processing Agreement which led to the recent $9.6bn judgment given against Nigeria and in favour of Process and Industrial Developments by a British court.

Taiga was said to have signed as Nigeria’s witness to the GSPA while the then minister presiding over the ministry, the late Dr. Rilwan Lukman, signed as Nigeria’s representative.

‎After she pleaded not guilty to the charges, her lawyer, Ola Olanipekun SAN, who said his client was suffering from hypertension and diabetes, pleaded with the court to allow her to be remanded in the custody of the EFCC.

But the EFCC’s lawyer, Bala Sanga, opposed the request, insisting that her proper place of custody after arraignment was the prison.

The judge agreed with the prosecuting counsel and ordered her remand in prison.

He, however, added that she should be accorded proper medical treatment in custody pending the hearing and determination of her bail application.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.