APC member challenges Party, Oyegun, other party officials in court over 1 year tenure extension

Uncategorized

Image result for apc logo

A member of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Imo State, Okere Uzochukwu, on Friday, approached a Federal High Court in Abuja challenging the extension of the tenure of members of the National Working Committee, NWC, of the party by one year.

The tenure of the leadership of the ruling party at the state, local government and ward levels was also extended by one year by the National Executive Committee, NEC, of the party on February 27, 2018.

Uzochukwu, who said he was an aspirant to the state chairmanship position of the party in Imo State, contended in the suit marked, FHC /ABJ/ CS/219/ 2018, that the tenure extension was undemocratic and violated the provisions of the constitution, the Electoral Act and the constitution of the APC.

He argued through his counsel, Nnamdi Okere, that the extension of the tenure of the officials of the party at various levels was “ the primary function and responsibility of the national convention ” by virtue of the provisions of Article 13 and 13 (3 ) (ii) of the constitution of the APC 2014 (as amended).

He stressed that the tenure extension was unconstitutional and undemocratic since the national convention did not hold.

The plaintiff urged the court to hold that the tenure extension for the NWC, the state working committees as well as the local government and ward executive committees of the party commencing from June 2018 to June 2019 “is illegal, unconstitutional , null and void and of no effect.”

He urged the court to compel the incumbent John Oyegun-led NWC and others to vacate their respective offices with effect from June 1, 2018 , when they would have completed their four-year tenure.

The plaintiff also sought an order compelling INEC to “reject, cease to recognise and stop dealing with or having official communications with the Odigie-Oyegun- led National Working Committee” and others effective from effective from June 1 , 2018, “for having spent the constitutionally allowed tenure of office.”

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.